Did You Know? If we told more scientists about the current problems, they’ll start publishing their new research with Open Access journals. arXiv is a well-known example and there are other new Open Access journals that allow their contents to be freely redistributed. The whole purpose of jotting down a to-do is for it to happen quickly, and then not have to think about it again. The goal is to publish as much as possible, in as prestigious a journal as possible. Prospective papers are shared with other researchers in the field who provide feedback, comments, and validation. I signed this White House petition and encourage you to share and do the same: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/reclassify-internet-broadband-providers-common-carriers/4MrqLTlV. This is a smart way to get into the space by providing a service that researchers can see immediate value in (less painful process of writing technical papers). But create a better tool for discovering and discussing the research. I came across this word "Arbitrary" when I read a Mathematics for Physics book. The problem is so bad that Harvard University Library complained in 2012 that it couldn’t afford to keep buying all the subscriptions anymore. Main menu. I started looking into this when reading Everything is Bullshit, but have tried to refer to the primary sources as much as possible in this post. One of the ways papers become important is through how many other cite them. Netflix recently signed a deal with Comcast, paying them to basically stop it. That means Comcast gets to charge us users to access the internet, and also change internet companies to use the “fast lane” and get their content to us at good speeds. Once this community is built, the distribution and prestige problems would be solved. Once the article is published, anyone who wants to read the results (including the researchers that created the knowledge in the first place) have to pay those journals large subscription fees. Reply [Disclaimer] I have not worked in academia. From there it’s a short step to offering peer review this new community. People could opt in to it. Let the current journal keep publishing the papers and keeping it behind their paywall. Take a look at the graph, guess who else is asking Netflix to pay them? [Disclaimer] I have not worked in academia. Allow the actual writers of the paper host their data. They provide tools to embed data into papers, and tools to collaborate with others to edit papers. Facebook doesn’t have a dislike button. Task lists feel like a small feature that that doesn’t take advantage of the Google firehose. Imagine what less well-funded institutions are facing. This is actually a market rich enough to support the business case for a disruptive startup. Their end goal is to make the underlying data more available, and they’re starting with improving the writing and editing process. The most common response is that they provide a valuable service in the form of peer review. http://marciovm.com/i-want-a-github-of-science/, http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/, https://github.com/blog/1840-improving-github-for-science. They can afford to pay this. Home; About ; Post navigation ← Previous Gimmi My Science! Comcast was already putting pressure on Netflix to give them money, and have been actively slowing down Netflix downloads to Comcast subscribers. This is about the next Netflix that doesn’t exist yet. Arbitrary Value. Fitbit, Jawbone, and Fuelband are all active, and providing value. From there it’s a short step to offering peer review this new community. They’re unpaid. It weighs Comments and Likes. Maybe this is just a problem of education. This will literally kill the internet. One of the most interesting startups tackling this problem is Authorea. The simple constraint is that it should be a function. I remember them being strong both in the productivity section and overall on the app store when the app store first launched, but the current store is all communication apps and games. Skip to secondary content. Create trackbacks and other linking mechanisms connecting the bibliography. This would move the center of gravity to a publicly viewable site. What do the journals have to say about why they charge such high fees? I think for a startup to actually make headway on the primary problem, they need to create a substitute for the value that journal papers provide right now: validation of research, distribution for research, and career prestige.

.

Best Walleye Fishing In Quebec Canada, Lenovo Yoga C740-15iml, Class 9 Chemistry Chapter 2 Notes, Infinix Note 9 Price In Pakistan, Red Jalapeno Sauce, Resolute Pink Vodka Price In Rajasthan,